New Article: Obama’s Foreclosure Fix — What’s McCain Thinking Today?

The Fox Forum asked me today if I'd be interested in writing something about the housing stabilization plan offered by the President, and here is what I wrote. It's very short, but I think it does make the point.

Here's the tease:

The proactive and progressive nature of President Obama’s plan should give Senator McCain a bit of pause, for it was he, let’s recall, who placed squarely within the center of the national spotlight his belief that the recovery of the economy would not be possible without the immediate stabilization of the housing market.

For the rest (just a little bit), click here.

Sphere: Related Content

New Article: Do We Need a Secretary of the Arts?

For the Fox Forum. My gratitude to the editor, Lynne Jordal Martin, for her help and advice on this one. I appreciate the opportunity very deeply.

Here's an extended tease:

As of today, more than 224,000 people have signed a petition asking President Obama to create a Secretary of the Arts. I signed the petition, but reservedly: At the federal level, I prefer the arts to stay depoliticized. What I favor more is a public policy toward the arts that emphasizes its impact on jobs and economic growth. The numbers may pique both left and right.

According to a 2007 report by Americans for the Arts, the arts generate $166.2 billion in annual fiscal activity-$63.1 billion in jobs, $103.1 billion in consumer spending. This translates into 5.7 million jobs, $7.9 billion in local tax revenues, $9.1 billion in state tax revenues and $12.6 billion federal tax revenues.

Given these statistics–and the Obama campaign’s articulation of a cultural policy as part of its national vision–arts advocates are eager for their part of whatever stimulus finally emerges from Congress. But arts advocates must be careful what they wish for, how hard they push and what language they employ in their cause.

Let me give you an example of what I mean. In a recent New York Times story, “Arts Leaders Urge Role for Culture in Economic Recovery,” Robert L. Lynch, president of Americans for the Arts, expressed fear that artists could be “left out of the recovery.” Any stimulus, he said, must show an “artist’s paycheck is every bit as important as the steelworker’s paycheck or the autoworker’s paycheck.”

Certainly Lynch is doing his job by saying that. But it would serve him well to heed the long tradition of American antipathy toward public arts funding. Later in The Times story, Lynch said that the Labor and Transportation Departments should also think about artists as they ponder their slice of the stimulus. So hypothetically, let’s say it authorizes new high-speed train stations to be built. Ideally for Lynch, there might be a mandate for those train stations to feature taxpayer-funded art. While I am all for the many “percent for art” programs that some states and cities use as part of their capital spending projects, Lynch inches close to favoring a 21st century version of the Works Progress Administration, a signature effort of the Roosevelt era. And that would likely mean war with conservatives. A quick primer on W.P.A. will explain why.

During the worst stretch of the Great Depression, the W.P.A. literally saved the nation’s creative economy-the Federal Theatre Project and Federal Art Project, to name two of its efforts, put tens of thousands back to work. When the Living Newspaper, a W.P.A.-sponsored performance piece, offered a work excoriating the Supreme Court for striking down aid for farmers, conservatives were furious. Already wary of federally funded art, this was the heyday of red scares, so the right rose in protest. Soon, Congress de-funded the W.P.A., satisfying those who saw in it only a slippery slide into socialism.

Federal arts funding has been a thorny, touchy issue ever since. President Johnson signed legislation creating the National Endowment for the Arts in 1965, but the agency’s name is a misnomer: the NEA is not an endowment in the sense of a pile of cash invested in the market with a percentage of returns annually dispersed to worthy recipients. Instead, the NEA relies on annual Congressional appropriations-another hand in the Treasury’s till. So when we’re discussing the fiscal impact of the arts, when we’re thinking about it in a stimulus-plan context, I believe Congress would be wiser to approve an appropriation of sufficient size and heft so the NEA could be made autonomous of the federal budget. For the left, a genuine endowment would ensure American creative professionals receive the support they need and deserve. For the right, an NEA that manages it’s funding through the market, like any endowment or foundation, would comport with conservative ideals.

Well, one can dream, right? Tentative plans for the stimulus call for an appropriation of $50 million on top of the current $144 million annual NEA budget. And that returns us to the subject of the economic impact of the arts. Another $50 million will generate fiscal growth, sure: Arts advocates have proven statistically for years that every dollar spent by the NEA returns a multiple of that dollar to state and local economies. But over the long term, don’t we also have to recognize that at some point, someday, somehow, the federal deficit will need addressing? What will become of federal arts funding then?

Sphere: Related Content

New Article: Obama's Report Card

Lynne Jordal Martin, editor of the Fox Forum, and the producer of "Fox News Watch" asked me to participate in an ongoing "report card" on how Obama is doing. Being part of Fox, you can just imagine how most of the writers -- and those who offers comments -- are responding. But I, however, gave him an A-. You can see what I wrote here.

Sphere: Related Content

Fox News, Fox Forum, The Strategy Room and More

A little more than a month ago, I was booked to promote my book, Historic Photos of Broadway, on The Strategy Room, which is a nine-hour daily program live-streamed on the FoxNews.com site, as opposed to broadcast over the airwaves. It's still shot in a studio and the seven famously banned words still apply, but otherwise a whole new familiar approach to news.

In my case, I was booked to promote my book on the 12pm entertainment hour, but just as often, if not more so, they've booked me on the 9am political/news show, which is certainly interesting, given the predominant political views of the Fox brethren and the fact that I don't subscribe to their radicalized viewpoints.

Except -- and here's the truly crazy thing -- many of them aren't radicals or holding radical viewpoints, I'm finding. And that's very enlightening. No, I'll never be a Republican -- I'd rather die in the flames of hell -- but it's awfully fascinating to be dwelling now and then in the supposed belly of the Republican beast and to observe less, um, bestality that I initially thought I'd find.

Anyway, while at Fox one day I was put in touch with Lynne Jordal Martin, a longtime toiler in the highways and by-ways of TV news (at CBS), and who is now managing The Fox Forum, the network's still-in-process blog that is designed to be like The Huffington Post. By agreement, I'll be writing essays on arts-and-politics topics two to three times a month for it. But as a way to get started, Lynne asked me to participate in something she put together for all the contributors for the end of the year. You can read my wish list as well as my predictions for 2009 here.

Nice way to start off the year, yes?

Sphere: Related Content